Learning from each other  Clip to Evernote

Getting taken to school, in a good way At the end of October, I’ll be giving a talk at Seneca College’s Free Software and Open Source Symposium here in Toronto. That talk will (of course) focus on documentation.

As part of the New Cruelty, I’ve been asking myself a few tough questions while preparing the presentation. One of those questions is Why should the FLOSS community listen to some corporate documentation guy? Admittedly, I’m not all that corporate – I don’t even own a suit. It’s an interesting question, but one which is definitely too narrow.

The question should be What can professional tech writers and the contributors to FLOSS documentation learn from each other? The short answer: quite a bit. The longer answer is below.

Different worlds, similar goals

Let’s start off with what the folks who write FLOSS documentation, who may not be professional technical writers, can learn from our wacky line of work:

  1. Information architecture – How to effectively develop, order, and arrange information in a piece of documentation or documentation set.
  2. Topic-based writing – I don’t think that needs any explanation …
  3. Content reuse – Ways in which to reuse topics or information in topics across a documentation set.

Let’s look at the other side of the coin and see what the technical writing world can learn from the people who contribute to FLOSS documentation:

  1. Writing as you’d speak – Compare the tone of what you write with the documentation for FLOSS applications. What’s written by professional tech writers can be a bit stiff and business like. FLOSS documentation, on the other hand, tends to be a little more relaxed and informal. The tone is friendlier.
  2. Working with the crowd – I’ve written about this, and so have others. The nature of our job is changing. We’ll be working with the people who read what we write more. And the FLOSS community has been doing that for a while now. Their experience is something we should tap.

Is that all? Definitely not, and if you can think of anything else feel free to leave a comment.

Quick postscript: Speaking of FLOSS, you might want to check out the new manual on BookSprints by the folks at FLOSS Manuals. Lots of interesting and useful goodness in that one.

Photo credit: jdurham from morguefile.com

  • Pingback: Tweets that mention   Learning from each other by Communications from DMN -- Topsy.com

  • http://technicalwriter.ivanwalsh.com/ Ivan Walsh

    Hi Scott.

    I think there’s a lot of common sense required when it comes to tech docs and the FLOSS project is a step in the right direction.

    Over in the UK, there was/is a drive to push plain writing techniques, especially in government and legal docs. This has proved to be a success so much that banks are now re-writing their brochures to be clearer, briefer and also to drop the jargon.

    The benefit (to the banks) is that clearer documentation and forms seems to generate more applications and improves customer satisfaction – which of course proves the effort is worth the investment and not just a pointless exercise in rewording docs for the sake of it.

    Best of luck with the presentation.

    Regards,

    Ivan,

    Beijing
    .-= Ivan Walsh´s last blog ..Does Outsourcing threaten US/UK Technical Writers? =-.

    • http://www.dmncommunications.com Scott

      Ivan,

      Thanks for the comment. And thanks for the information about the drive to plain writing in government and legal docs. If you don’t mind, I’d like to quote what you wrote in my presentation.

  • Pingback: Scott Nesbitt (scottnesbitt) 's status on Monday, 28-Sep-09 23:32:27 UTC - Identi.ca