28 Sep
Posted by Scott as Open Source, authoring, opinion, technical communication, writing
At the end of October, I’ll be giving a talk at Seneca College’s Free Software and Open Source Symposium here in Toronto. That talk will (of course) focus on documentation.
As part of the New Cruelty, I’ve been asking myself a few tough questions while preparing the presentation. One of those questions is Why should the FLOSS community listen to some corporate documentation guy? Admittedly, I’m not all that corporate – I don’t even own a suit. It’s an interesting question, but one which is definitely too narrow.
The question should be What can professional tech writers and the contributors to FLOSS documentation learn from each other? The short answer: quite a bit. The longer answer is below.
Let’s start off with what the folks who write FLOSS documentation, who may not be professional technical writers, can learn from our wacky line of work:
Let’s look at the other side of the coin and see what the technical writing world can learn from the people who contribute to FLOSS documentation:
Is that all? Definitely not, and if you can think of anything else feel free to leave a comment.
Quick postscript: Speaking of FLOSS, you might want to check out the new manual on BookSprints by the folks at FLOSS Manuals. Lots of interesting and useful goodness in that one.
Photo credit: jdurham from morguefile.com
Related posts:
4 Responses
Tweets that mention Learning from each other by Communications from DMN -- Topsy.com
September 28th, 2009 at 8:49 am
1[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by DMN Communications. DMN Communications said: [BLog post] Learning from each other – http://u.nu/9urc3 [...]
Ivan Walsh
September 28th, 2009 at 8:58 am
2Hi Scott.
I think there’s a lot of common sense required when it comes to tech docs and the FLOSS project is a step in the right direction.
Over in the UK, there was/is a drive to push plain writing techniques, especially in government and legal docs. This has proved to be a success so much that banks are now re-writing their brochures to be clearer, briefer and also to drop the jargon.
The benefit (to the banks) is that clearer documentation and forms seems to generate more applications and improves customer satisfaction – which of course proves the effort is worth the investment and not just a pointless exercise in rewording docs for the sake of it.
Best of luck with the presentation.
Regards,
Ivan,
Beijing
Ivan Walsh´s last blog ..Does Outsourcing threaten US/UK Technical Writers?
Scott
September 28th, 2009 at 9:50 am
3Ivan,
Thanks for the comment. And thanks for the information about the drive to plain writing in government and legal docs. If you don’t mind, I’d like to quote what you wrote in my presentation.
Scott Nesbitt (scottnesbitt) 's status on Monday, 28-Sep-09 23:32:27 UTC - Identi.ca
September 28th, 2009 at 7:32 pm
4[...] post] Learning from each other – http://www.dmncommunications.com/weblog/?p=1450 #techcomm [...]
RSS feed for comments on this post · TrackBack URI
Leave a reply
Blogroll
Past Entries