- A great article (it’s a PDF) by Anne Gentle, Lisa Dyer, and Michael Priestly on building a DITA-wiki hybrid.
- Does working on screen change the way we think? This blog post speculates that it just might.
- Mike Hughes discusses two ways in which user assistance adds value, and how to communicate that value to the suits.
- Need to build a DITA specialization? Then check out this online tool.
- The stem sentence debate: a cause for concern, or just a quibble? Read this article and then decide.
In case you didn’t listen to last week’s podcast, Aaron and I will be giving a presentation at the May 13 meeting of the Toronto chapter of the STC. The title of the presentation is “The Ears Have It”, and it will discuss how podcasts:
- Can help maintain an ongoing dialogue about a particular domain or topic
- Are a great way to disseminate new developments
- Are available anytime, anywhere, at the user’s convenience
- Make supplementary material more interesting
We’ll also be outlining the mechanics of podcasting, analyzing why some popular training and educational podcasts are successful, and how you can use the same techniques with your audio materials.
If you’re in the Toronto area, why not drop in, have a listen, and ask a few questions? You can get directions to the meeting here.
- The rise of embedded assistance
- Increased reliance on multimedia
- The migration to structured authoring
- Conversing with users
There are a few more trends out there, I’m sure. The ones that I’m interested in are using wikis for internal and customer-facing documentation, and incorporating user-generated documentation in your documentation set.
What do you see as being some of the current trends in our industry? Feel free to leave a comment.
I came across this interesting article in the New York Times about Philip Parker, a college professor who has written over 200,000 books using patented content creation software. This had me thinking – could this sort of technology ever be used to author technical content? Theoretically, it could. Continue reading
In a February, 2008 blog post, Tom Johnson answered 13 questions about the job of technical writing. As with many of Tom’s posts, this one got me thinking. This time, about the questions people have asked me concerning becoming a freelance technical writer.
If you’re considering a move to the contract side of the fence, you might want to think about the questions in this blog post before making a decision.
Frame versus Word. Robohelp versus Flare. DocBook versus DITA. Coffee versus green tea. Those are some of the debates that many of us in the technical communications field take part in regularly. OK, maybe not the last one …
But I think that the DocBook versus DITA debate is one of the biggest ones going on right now. This article at The Content Wrangler looks at the DocBook and DITA’s strengths and how to make the choice. Teresa Mulvihill (with whom Aaron and I will be doing a podcast interview at DocTrain West) also wrote an excellent comparison of these rival XML schemes.
My take? DocBook and DITA both have their places. They’re both excellent for single sourcing. DocBook is better for what I call monolithic single sourcing, while DITA is better suited for discrete single sourcing. If you don’t have a lot of reuse of content in your organization, then DocBook is a good choice. If, on the other hand, if there is (or you anticipate) a lot of reuse then consider DITA.
Thoughts? Feel free to leave a comment.